<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomballard.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomballard.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by James</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Oh, and one more thing to clarify my last point:

The title of Corinne&#039;s article is &quot;Should gay men make sexist jokes?&quot;.  Remove the &#039;gay men&#039; from the article - the broader issue is really &quot;what, if anything, should be &#039;off limits&#039; in comedy?&quot;.  Many comedians deliberately aim to push the boundaries of what is offensive and what is acceptable.  Wil Anderson has made the point - &quot;You have a right to be offended; but you don&#039;t have the right NOT to be offended.&quot;  That is, when a comedian makes a joke that offends someone, they can convey their offence, but the mere fact that someone is offended by something doesn&#039;t mean the comedian must steer clear of that material.

Whilst true gratuitous misogyny and sexism is not something I respond to, I think it&#039;s a big step to say that comedians shouldn&#039;t push and prod the boundaries.  Some of the best and most thought-provoking humour comes from causing offence, then making us question just why we find that offensive, and examine our own value systems in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and one more thing to clarify my last point:</p>
<p>The title of Corinne&#8217;s article is &#8220;Should gay men make sexist jokes?&#8221;.  Remove the &#8216;gay men&#8217; from the article &#8211; the broader issue is really &#8220;what, if anything, should be &#8216;off limits&#8217; in comedy?&#8221;.  Many comedians deliberately aim to push the boundaries of what is offensive and what is acceptable.  Wil Anderson has made the point &#8211; &#8220;You have a right to be offended; but you don&#8217;t have the right NOT to be offended.&#8221;  That is, when a comedian makes a joke that offends someone, they can convey their offence, but the mere fact that someone is offended by something doesn&#8217;t mean the comedian must steer clear of that material.</p>
<p>Whilst true gratuitous misogyny and sexism is not something I respond to, I think it&#8217;s a big step to say that comedians shouldn&#8217;t push and prod the boundaries.  Some of the best and most thought-provoking humour comes from causing offence, then making us question just why we find that offensive, and examine our own value systems in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by Sea No Evil</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Sea No Evil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-251</guid>
		<description>How much of an individual&#039;s personality must be tied up with a specific body part before the perceived insult is the problem of the offended rather than the, so called, offender. In the example cited replace the word &#039;Vagina&#039; with any other physical attribute - Ear Hair, Elbow Skin,the prostate -  and see whether the same joke still seeks to denegrate an entire demographic.  Ie is it really mean spirited and or just uncomfortable?
Experience suggests that offence is taken far more often than it is ever given .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of an individual&#8217;s personality must be tied up with a specific body part before the perceived insult is the problem of the offended rather than the, so called, offender. In the example cited replace the word &#8216;Vagina&#8217; with any other physical attribute &#8211; Ear Hair, Elbow Skin,the prostate &#8211;  and see whether the same joke still seeks to denegrate an entire demographic.  Ie is it really mean spirited and or just uncomfortable?<br />
Experience suggests that offence is taken far more often than it is ever given .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by James</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-250</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Tom&#039;s perspective here.

I think Corinne&#039;s article falls into the common trap, so often repeated these days, of applying labels like &quot;sexist&quot;, &quot;racist&quot;, &quot;misogynist&quot; etc to comments that really do not meet the criteria.  Given the serious nature of such accusations people really need to think a bit more about whether their accusation really meets the description.

In my opinion, none of the examples given by Corinne of allegedly misogynist/sexist jokes measures up to that label.  For example: &quot;Every time I even think the word &#039;vagina&#039;, I want to gag&quot; is really a personal comment about oneself rather than on women in general.  Even if the person was putting forward the dubious view that objectively, vaginas were disgusting, that does not equate to true misogyny (hatred of women).  That&#039;s like saying someone who does not like (say) train stations must hate all cities with train stations.  It does not follow that if you don&#039;t like one aspect of a class of things, even an integral aspect of a class of things, that you hate that whole class of things.  One can consistently say, for instance, that &quot;I really love Christmas even though I find wrapping presents a drag.&quot;

An aspect of Corinne&#039;s article that I do agree with is that generally, no group can stake a claim to being able to get away with behaviour that another group can&#039;t.  If it&#039;s unacceptable for one class of people it should generally be unacceptable for all.  Straight comedians shouldn&#039;t be misogynist; gay comedians shouldn&#039;t be misogynist.  However, be very careful before throwing around false accusations of misogyny and sexism.  Just because someone makes a joke that has something to do with women, doesn&#039;t make it sexist or misogynist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Tom&#8217;s perspective here.</p>
<p>I think Corinne&#8217;s article falls into the common trap, so often repeated these days, of applying labels like &#8220;sexist&#8221;, &#8220;racist&#8221;, &#8220;misogynist&#8221; etc to comments that really do not meet the criteria.  Given the serious nature of such accusations people really need to think a bit more about whether their accusation really meets the description.</p>
<p>In my opinion, none of the examples given by Corinne of allegedly misogynist/sexist jokes measures up to that label.  For example: &#8220;Every time I even think the word &#8216;vagina&#8217;, I want to gag&#8221; is really a personal comment about oneself rather than on women in general.  Even if the person was putting forward the dubious view that objectively, vaginas were disgusting, that does not equate to true misogyny (hatred of women).  That&#8217;s like saying someone who does not like (say) train stations must hate all cities with train stations.  It does not follow that if you don&#8217;t like one aspect of a class of things, even an integral aspect of a class of things, that you hate that whole class of things.  One can consistently say, for instance, that &#8220;I really love Christmas even though I find wrapping presents a drag.&#8221;</p>
<p>An aspect of Corinne&#8217;s article that I do agree with is that generally, no group can stake a claim to being able to get away with behaviour that another group can&#8217;t.  If it&#8217;s unacceptable for one class of people it should generally be unacceptable for all.  Straight comedians shouldn&#8217;t be misogynist; gay comedians shouldn&#8217;t be misogynist.  However, be very careful before throwing around false accusations of misogyny and sexism.  Just because someone makes a joke that has something to do with women, doesn&#8217;t make it sexist or misogynist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by hornet</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>hornet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-249</guid>
		<description>You do a joke, if it works, keep it, if it doesn&#039;t move on. Simple. If you&#039;re making people laugh, you are making a difference. People need to loosen up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do a joke, if it works, keep it, if it doesn&#8217;t move on. Simple. If you&#8217;re making people laugh, you are making a difference. People need to loosen up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by Keith</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-248</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’ve seen plenty of routines by straight male comics about how disgusting they find the notion of gay sex. I’m not offended by these routines and I wouldn’t class them as homophobic&lt;/i&gt;

Well, I would call it homophobic. I hate the gay male attitude of &quot;ewww vaginas&quot; as much as I hate the straight male attitude of &quot;ewww gay sex&quot;. No one is suggesting they have to indulge in something they find unappealing, but when it&#039;s used as the basis for humour, they are perpetuating the idea that it&#039;s okay to hate on people for their body parts or their sexuality. So I think it&#039;s important to question these things - rather than suggesting it&#039;s okay for the haters to hate, as long as they are comedians making jokes about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’ve seen plenty of routines by straight male comics about how disgusting they find the notion of gay sex. I’m not offended by these routines and I wouldn’t class them as homophobic</i></p>
<p>Well, I would call it homophobic. I hate the gay male attitude of &#8220;ewww vaginas&#8221; as much as I hate the straight male attitude of &#8220;ewww gay sex&#8221;. No one is suggesting they have to indulge in something they find unappealing, but when it&#8217;s used as the basis for humour, they are perpetuating the idea that it&#8217;s okay to hate on people for their body parts or their sexuality. So I think it&#8217;s important to question these things &#8211; rather than suggesting it&#8217;s okay for the haters to hate, as long as they are comedians making jokes about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by Craig Robinson</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that Corinne has decided to target gay comics as somehow being offensive without going into details about just who is is referring to. How about we treat people as people. She would no doubt be outraged if someone wrote a &quot;all female comics do is talk about their periods.&quot; Without specifics it&#039;s pointless. I think I know who she is referring to and I assume it&#039;s the same person who allowed her to borrow their jokes when hosting raw comedy years ago because she didn&#039;t have enough of her own. She should write some jokes herself, actually take the mic off the stand during a gig and leave the criticism for the critics. Such a bullshit half arsed attack on you Tom. Surely she has a reality tv show to do a voice over for rather than write this garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that Corinne has decided to target gay comics as somehow being offensive without going into details about just who is is referring to. How about we treat people as people. She would no doubt be outraged if someone wrote a &#8220;all female comics do is talk about their periods.&#8221; Without specifics it&#8217;s pointless. I think I know who she is referring to and I assume it&#8217;s the same person who allowed her to borrow their jokes when hosting raw comedy years ago because she didn&#8217;t have enough of her own. She should write some jokes herself, actually take the mic off the stand during a gig and leave the criticism for the critics. Such a bullshit half arsed attack on you Tom. Surely she has a reality tv show to do a voice over for rather than write this garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by Liz</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Totes Mindy- where were you when I needed a snappy example rather than to write an essay! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totes Mindy- where were you when I needed a snappy example rather than to write an essay! <img src='http://tomballard.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by Leeroy</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 03:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t we use the same justifications for racism or discrimination of those with physical disabilities though?  If a racist hates one&#039;s skin colour is it just the colour and not the person?
Comedians are people first and therefore should be held to the same standards as the rest of us non comedians.
After all what barriers are we breaking down by commenting on the physical appearance of a vagina or bag of testes?
I do take issue with the statement that one who makes misogynist comments is not always a misogynist.  It sounds just like I&#039;m not a misogynist but...

Ultimately I am so pleased with the discussion.
And interestingly I have always preferred Tom to Corrinne.  
Ooh!  In a comedic sense of course!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t we use the same justifications for racism or discrimination of those with physical disabilities though?  If a racist hates one&#8217;s skin colour is it just the colour and not the person?<br />
Comedians are people first and therefore should be held to the same standards as the rest of us non comedians.<br />
After all what barriers are we breaking down by commenting on the physical appearance of a vagina or bag of testes?<br />
I do take issue with the statement that one who makes misogynist comments is not always a misogynist.  It sounds just like I&#8217;m not a misogynist but&#8230;</p>
<p>Ultimately I am so pleased with the discussion.<br />
And interestingly I have always preferred Tom to Corrinne.<br />
Ooh!  In a comedic sense of course!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by Mindy</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 03:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-243</guid>
		<description>For me the difference lies between jokes about vaginas being awful where the teller sees it as something about himself (assuing a gay male comedian) and where the teller sees it as being something about the woman. For example: &quot;I really don&#039;t get the attraction to vaginas, but then I&#039;m a gay man&quot; is fine whereas &quot;I really don&#039;t get the attraction to vaginas, those things are disgusting&quot; is not. Making fun of yourself is one thing, belittling another person is just lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the difference lies between jokes about vaginas being awful where the teller sees it as something about himself (assuing a gay male comedian) and where the teller sees it as being something about the woman. For example: &#8220;I really don&#8217;t get the attraction to vaginas, but then I&#8217;m a gay man&#8221; is fine whereas &#8220;I really don&#8217;t get the attraction to vaginas, those things are disgusting&#8221; is not. Making fun of yourself is one thing, belittling another person is just lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Response To Corinne Grant by maeve</title>
		<link>http://tomballard.com.au/a-response-to-corinne-grant/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>maeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 03:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomballard.com.au/?p=626#comment-242</guid>
		<description>content aside (and incidentally, i think you make some excellent points), i would really, truly like to congratulate you on the fine product placement of links to bookings for your show. from one self-promoter to another (with no mockery intended), i enjoy the shameless awesomeness of &quot;Right – back to writing my jokes. JOKES WHICH WILL APPEAR IN MY SHOW WHICH JUST SO HAPPENS TO BE ON SALE NOW. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>content aside (and incidentally, i think you make some excellent points), i would really, truly like to congratulate you on the fine product placement of links to bookings for your show. from one self-promoter to another (with no mockery intended), i enjoy the shameless awesomeness of &#8220;Right – back to writing my jokes. JOKES WHICH WILL APPEAR IN MY SHOW WHICH JUST SO HAPPENS TO BE ON SALE NOW. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

